Libya Archaeological Guides; TRIPOLITANIA
By Philip Kenrick, published by Silphium Press, isbn 978-1-900971-08-9
Libyan Studies 40; Journal of the Society of Libyan Studies - 2009
If poets perch on the summit, the writers of guide-books occupy the very
lowest strata of the literary pyramid. Their work is never reviewed, they
are seldom allowed to possess the copyright of their work, seldom see their
name on cover or spine and are famously underpaid by their publishers, who
routinely pulp old editions and employ another generation of hungry young
hacks to rewrite an updated new edition. In return they offer the world an
often sorry and second-hand product, a listings service of bargain hotels
and burger-bars, interwoven with flippant reviews of tourist destinations.
The prevailing mood is seemingly inspired by Jack Kerouac, the need to keep
moving, to stay on the road, to pack light, to become a traveller.
Fortunately, now and then, you stumble across a guidebook of a quite
different calibre - one written with a lifetime of learning, peppered with
enthusiasm, a distillation of decades of on the ground knowledge, experience
and passion. Philip Kenrick¹s Tripolitania is just such a book, worthy to
stand in the pantheon beside George Bean¹s four volumes on the Turkish
coast, Rupert Gunnis¹s Cyprus and Ross Burns¹ Historic Syria.
I have taken dozens of history and cultural tours of Libya, poured over
published archaeological reports, amassed sheaves of photocopied maps, even
prepared a draft guidebook of my own so I came to the text of Tripolitania
with a fully sharpened and potentially critical eye. I was also able to
take it on a test drive, for by chance I was asked to take a famous war
photographer around some of the great classical sites of Libya, shortly
after my review copy came in the post. And time and time again, I found
Kenrick had not only got it right, but had marshalled the information in an
admirably concise and accessible style. He is also honest. Not a whiff of
the ministry of culture varnish of what it should be like - if the signpost
to the historic tombs of Ghirza is a rusty oil barrel, if an ancient place
of worship has become immersed in town litter, if an ancient mosque is now
obscured by apartment block development, if a prize exhibit from a museum
has gone off on loan, if a marble bench has been damaged and been sent off
to the storeroom we get to hear about it. Within the first few pages, he
won my complete trust, and quickly became an indispensable travelling
companion. Like recognizing the quirks of a friend, the photographer and I
we learned to recognize his enthusiasm for dating 4th century earthquakes
and his complete (and wise) refusal to get involved in anything to do with
the archaeological quagmire of Christian and Muslim schisms (unlike myself).
Although clearly a methodical archaeologist himself, I was pleased to find
that Kenrick was broadminded enough to include oral historical traditions -
but not to the extent that he did not come down heavily from time to time on
the tall tales made up by local guides. Hopefully the misattribution of
those weird and wonderful series of atrophaic carvings at Leptis Magna
(where outsize phallic creatures, assisted by crabs, scorpions, birds and
snakes struggle against the baleful influence of the eyil eye) as brothel
signposts will now cease. He also cites the descriptions of early European
travellers and makes good use of their sketches. While we get to hear of
their unfashionably dated prejudices, we also get to appreciate them as the
advanced guard of today¹s knowledgeable state-of-the art excavators.
Fortunately he is also enough of an archaeological insider to relish the
variant interpretations put forward by rival Œauthorities.¹ For each
generation will always bring their own currency of ideas and experience to
their digs, so that what was once identified as Roman border settlements of
armed colonial militia, can now clearly be seen to be indigenous
Libyan-Berber dry-farming communities. Reading Kenrick one can almost feel
the heat of the rivalry between Giacomo Caputo and John Ward-Perkins over
the dating of the theatre at Sabratha as either an Antonine or Severan
monument. And indeed the jury is still out on this issue, just as it is over
the purpose, history and artistic reference points that would allow us to
interpret Leptis Magna¹s imposing Chalcidium monument. Not that Kenrick is
always content to sit on the fence as a disinterested judge. No-one who
first examines those astonishing baroque pediments on the rebuilt arch of
Septimius Severus, that have been twisted 90% upwards, to point to the sky,
can quite believe the evidence of their eyes, but Kenrick is adamant -
Œtheir position on the monument is unquestionable¹. Any art historian who
has built a reputation by attempting to date the Roman mosaics of North
Africa on stylistic grounds will find Kenrick a very severe and pragmatic
critic. Those of us who have struggled to translate the Arabic labels in
Libya¹s impressively rich archaeological museums, in order to make sense of
some curious juxtapositions, will find his detailed coverage of the
collections, something of a relief and a revelation. For it has clearly
become an ingrained habit amongst Libyan curators to share out the
incredibly rich material culture from Leptis Magna amongst galleries and
provincial collections that might otherwise look a little empty. Armed with
Kenrick one can not only finally pin down the attributions, placing for
instance that gorgeous collection of Julio-Claudean Imperial statues into
the old temple of Melkarth-Hercules (which forms a triple Sbeitla-like
platform in the old Forum at Leptis), but also to marvel at the bizarre
workings of chance by which Libyas extraordinarily rich past has been
preserved. The tidal wave which may have destroyed the Hadrianic Baths of
Leptis Magna for example, also conspired to seal and preserve its vast
gallery of statues in a protective bed of mud. Though a classicist himself
we also get to hear about the regrettable early 20th-century habit of
clearing away the medieval levels to get at the golden-age achievements of
the Roman Empire, quite literally sweeping away the Byzantine and early
Islamic periods into oblivion.
My final test drive of this exemplary guidebook was to check up on half a
dozen specific items that I have long puzzled over.
I began with the gorgeous marble statue in the main entrance hall of
Tripoli¹s museum. All too often it is pointed out, to tour groups as the
famous Aphrodite of Cyrene, unearthed in a flash flood before the astonished
eyes of the Italian troops who became instantly converted to archaeology.
Armed with the gift of Kenrick, the tour guides can now tell an equally
interesting but correct story. The Venus was found in the baths of Leptis
Magna, then given by Mussolini to Air-marshal Goering, and returned to Rome
in 1945 and a generation later would finally make her way back to her native
North Africa in 1999.
The trial of Apuleius of Madauros for witchcraft at Sabratha is one of those
minor events from the Antonine Golden Age which brings the history of that
period bubbling to the surface. It is tempting to try and summon up the
spirit of the author of The Golden Ass, by reading from his works in the
Temple of Isis and the great theatre, but Kenrick is nicely emphatic that
the actual trial would have occurred in front of the exedra tribunal that
overlooks the large internal hall of the forum basilica.
Another small mystery is the identity of the little rock promontory of Ras
al-Ghul outside the Saharan oasis trading town of Ghadames. Local guides
are quite insistent that it was a Roman frontier fort, though I have looked
in vain on a number of occasions for any tell-tale signs of ceramic sherds
or dressed stone. I was fascinated to find from Kenrick that he also Œknew
of no archaeological investigations at the site or evidence of date¹.
However he has managed to take the local story back to a seventh-century
date when Ghadames (then functioning as an independent Saharan city-state in
treaty relationship with the Byantine Empire) had surrendered to the cavalry
army of Oqba ibn Nafi. Those who couldn¹t make their submission to the Arab
general, are remembered to have used the rock of Ras al-Ghul as their last
fortress. This rang all the right bells (not only for why this might have
been a remembered element of local history) but also because it brought the
archaeological and traditional sources of history together in pleasing
harmony. I was also delighted to find that Kenrick shared my opinion about
the classical architectural fragments embedded in some of the old buildings
in Ghadames (particularly the hammam associated with the Yunis mosque) which
were almost certainly sourced from the so-called Idols, the remains of a
group of Roman period mausolea. For though Ghadames (Cidamenses) appears on
all the frontier itineraries, no actual Roman military base has (yet) been
identified.
The identification of the remains of the great sanctuary that overlooks the
New Forum of Septimius Severus as a temple dedicated to the ŒGens Septimia¹
has long puzzled me. To anyone who has looked at the wider religious and
philosophical revival sponsored by this Roman Emperor and his Syrian wife,
as well as their own well attested Punic and Semitic piety, this would seem
to be a quite impossible aberration. I was delighted to find that Kenrick -
although he uses this traditional identification in his guide-book, has
also put it in italics and agrees that the dedication is Œuncertain¹. Much
more to my taste was his suggestion that the well-planned theme of marble
carvings in the associated basilica (honouring Bacchus and Hercules) would
tie in well with Cassius Dio¹s complaint that the Emperor had built, Œan
excessively large temple to Bacchus and Hercules¹.
The final use which I made of my already well-thumbed Kenrick, was to stuff
it in the pocket of my linen jacket as I travelled with my friend to the
Roman frontier fortress of Bou Njem. I have been there a number of times
but I have to confess that a quick glance at Kenrick as we brewed some
coffee in the lee of the neighbouring Italian fort (waiting for that crisp
dawn light in which to make the perfect photograph essay) greatly sharpened
my wits. To be able to identify the secret storeroom of the chapel of the
standards (now once more buried under tons of beautiful windblown sand), the
site of the secretary-filled scriptorium, to cite the exact day in which the
Roman troops first made camp, added immeasurably to the tangible pleasure of
my guest.
My only complaint as a reader, reviewer and user is that I wanted more. A
ten page appendix on the use of buildings, how a worshipper related to a
temple sanctuary, how a Roman dinner party was given, how and when the
forum, the baths, the theatre and the amphitheatre were used, might be a
very useful addition for the interested general reader. Nor did I think
that the cut-off line of the Hilalian invasion (although entirely
understandable most especially for a classicist) really worked for a
guide-book pitched at the general reader. There are real dangers in
including all the Roman, Byzantine and Berber monuments (not to mention a
post-Hilalian 20th century fascist arch) and then to be found to be lacking
in interest in the bulk of the Islamic evidence. It also must be remembered
that for the vast bulk of visitors to Libya, it is a once-in-a lifetime
trip, and the doorway of the Gurgi Mosque stands intriguingly open beside
the arch of Marcus Aurelius, just as the Karamanlis Mosque stands right
beside the Archaeological Museum. If this guidebook is to compete against
other lesser products in the bookshops and on the websites, it must not
damage itself in this way. I would like the second edition of this
wonderful guide to include all the historical monuments of Tripolitania. In
the meanwhile I salute the Society of Libyan Studies, and its offshoot, the
Silphium Press, for having published a most exceptional guidebook to the
classical archaeology of Tripolitania.
Back to Reviews page
|
Recent Books by Barnaby Rogerson
|